Meet the AI robot who can switch between ‘family’ and ‘sexy’

[Echoing the excellent series Humans, the latest advanced sex doll includes a broader set of AI-based behaviors. The first story below, from LADbible, describes Sergi Santos’ creation; the second story, from MIC, considers some of the many ethical issues it (she?) raises. See the Synthiea Amatus website for much more information including images and videos.  –Matthew]

Meet The AI Robot Who Can Switch Between ‘Family’ And ‘Sexy’

Michael Minay in MORE
March 20, 2017

Meet Silicon Samantha. An artificial intelligence robot who has a functioning G-Sport and can switch between ‘family’ and ‘sexy’ mode.

She’s been revealed to the world by her creator, Sergio Santos who claims that the robot is getting pretty close to realness.

Samantha has a functional vagina and mouth designed by her Spanish inventor.

The bot has dark brown hair, green eyes (that disturbingly don’t blink) and is capable of ’emotional closeness’ according to Sergi.

He said: “Samantha is interactive. Basically she likes to be touched.

“She has different modes of interaction – she has romantic, she has family and she also has sexy modes.

Her family ‘senses’ come from touching the hands and the hips, and apparently this is how she starts out; wanting to be part of your family.

Her sexual phrases include: “I’m on for you all the time’, “nice and gentle” and “Now then, what’s next?”

So, what does Samantha like in the bedroom?

“Normally she likes to be kissed… and she responds to, basically, the G-spot and the breasts,” he said.

“You get to a point that she wants to be sexual,” he continued.

“The final objective of the sexual mode is to give her an orgasm.”

Experts reckon these dolls could be a common feature in the bedroom in the next 25 years or so.

We’ll leave you as the jury on that one.

For anyone wondering what it’s like getting with one these things, a woman has revealed what it’s like to ‘get intimate’ with a male sex doll as experts predict that AI in the bedroom will be normal within 25 years.

Karley Sciortino, 31, explored the doll’s capabilities over a 20-minute session. The doll, Gabriel, was 5ft 9 inches with real pubic hair and his penis even had ‘flaccid’ and ‘erect’ options.

Sex columnist for both Vogue and Vice, Sciortino, said that it felt very real: “I feel like I am on a Tinder date.

“It feels weird because it is so lifelike but it enters this space which feels uncomfortable.

“It feels like a real person who can’t respond to you.”

In the documentary for VICE, she is shown having sex with the doll while describing how it feels. She says: “It feels absolutely indistinguishable from a real person except that I am completely in control.

“You can’t have this experience having sex with a real person.”

This might seem weird and a bit creepy now, but as recently as December experts were claiming that artificial intelligence in the bedroom will be the norm within 25 years.

Speaking at an international robotics conference, Dr Trudy Barber said that the machines would enable people to appreciate “the real thing” more.

While at the International Congress of Love and Sex with Robotics, she said: “It could be that we are so busy with our lives, we are so embedded in our technological narrative that the idea of engaging in long-distance sex and robot sex is actually a natural process in our evolutionary cycle.

“I think what will happen is that they will make real-time relationships more valuable and exciting.”


[From MIC…]

The latest futuristic sex doll is teaching men all the wrong things about consent

Published Mar 21, 2017
by Melanie Ehrenkranz

If you don’t touch or pay attention to Samantha, she will eventually give up. Touch her on the hip, and she’ll tell you she’s always there for you. Touch her on the shoulder, and she’ll say “I’m yours.” Touch her mouth or her chest and she might switch from “romantic” to “sexy” mode.

Samantha is a sex robot that needs to be seduced. “There’s a certain amount of things that you need to do before she’s actually ready for sex, basically,” engineer Sergi Santos said about his creation. But the gamification of sexy hardware designed in a woman’s likeness is not romance — in fact, it downplays the idea of consent. After all, Samantha is programmed to say yes.

The big problem with sex robots: It’s dangerous to gamify consent

“The idea that this type of robot has a consent-oriented approach trivializes and misconstrues what consent is, and raises concerns about how users might behave in sexual encounters with real women,” Sinziana Gutiu, a Canadian lawyer focusing on human rights, privacy and human-computer interaction, said in an email. “It sends the message that women are always sexually or ‘romantically’ available, and that ‘consent’ is just a matter of persistence and touching them in the right place.”

It’s important to understand the consequences of attempting to program artificial consent, Gutiu said, which in real life is much more nuanced. If Samantha’s game were applied to a real woman, Gutiu said, it could be illegal — classified as sexual harassment or assault.

“Consent is established when an autonomous person makes a voluntary, subjective decision to engage in a sexual activity, and can be withdrawn at any time,” she noted. “Identifying when consent is given or withdrawn can be a complex exercise, which includes the ability to recognize factual, attitudinal, cultural, expressive and implied cues.”

When I sent sex tech entrepreneur Cindy Gallop, founder of If We Ran the World and Make Love Not Porn, the video of Santos and Samantha, she responded, “Oh, for fuck’s sake.”

Gallop said that “a robot cannot consent” and that “to build your own, male-lens version of ‘consent’ and ‘romance’ into a robot is an oxymoron, and a dangerous model for interacting with women in real life.”

“I literally don’t know where to even start with how much this perpetuates already dangerous male myths about women,” Gallop said. “‘She wants you to persist!’ ‘All you have to do to turn her on is grab her pussy!'”

The man who built Samantha

Engineer Sergi Santos, who is based in Barcelona, aimed to create a doll that can offer more than just sex. For example, he said in a phone call, he and Samantha watch TV together sometimes.

Santos became obsessed with sex dolls about a year ago and bought “many of them,” he said. “I saw these bodies and I was amazed.” He wanted to improve upon them by “designing a brain.”

“I think that men should understand that a woman is not an object,” he said. “It’s not that you stick a penis in vagina and that’s all. I said no, it’s … about having a companion as well.”

He said Samantha runs on an algorithm called “call for attention.” “I hope it’s not degrading to anyone,” Santos said. “Everybody needs attention.”

Santos said he “wasn’t trying to disrespect anybody” with Samantha. “I was trying to mimic the human brain. I did a woman because I’m a man. Maybe if I were a woman, I’d do a man.” He said people want a sex doll they can “spend time with.” And as for sex, he said, “this is what men do — put the penis in the vagina.”

These sex robots are built for men, by men

Samantha is just the latest in a long line of servile female robots built by men. Engineers at the University of Science and Technology of China programmed Jiajia, a submissive android, to refer to them as “lords” and to express concern about her face looking fat if someone is taking a picture close to her face. Hong Kong designer Ricky Ma built a robot that looks eerily like Scarlett Johansson (though he called it Mark 1). RealDoll is building sex robots with AI built in; the CEO infamously said in a Reddit AMA that the “human female” was their direct competition.

They teach guys dangerous ideas about relationships — and reinforce misogynistic beliefs

Patrick Lin, an associate professor of philosophy and director of the ethics and emerging sciences group at California Polytechnic State University, said that with Samantha in particular, the things a user has to do or say to get her to respond in the way you’d like seem “clichéd.”

“It’s as if a frustrated nerd imagined how people actually talked to one another, or maybe it’s his fantasy,” Lin said. “The danger is that users who don’t know any better — who are inexperienced with relationships — are being trained on faulty scripts and may have worse luck when they pursue real relationships.”

Lin added that it’s unsurprising that there are individuals who, due to social awkwardness or sociopathy, might view relationships as a puzzle or achievement that can be unlocked — like in The Sims, for example.

“A generation of people have already been raised to gamify relationships,” he said. “In actual society, this mindset is not only inauthentic but, likely, also ineffective.”

Beyond the dangers of wrongly educating users on what consent is and isn’t, the sex robots entering the market today also reinforce misogynistic beliefs about women — that they’re submissive, subservient and designed to perpetually cater to men’s desires.

Gutiu summed it up: “These oppressive stereotypes risk further entrenching gender inequalities and reproducing false conceptions about women’s abilities and worth, encouraging misogynistic reactions to women and demeaning women’s role in society. The gender dynamics at play suggest that ‘gamifying romance’ through sexbots may be part of a broader continuation of women’s oppression.”

And if a world where consent is trivialized through machines designed as disparaging female stereotypes isn’t horrifying enough, there’s something even more frightening to consider: Imagine all of the data these future sexbots equipped with AI could collect about your sexual preferences.

This entry was posted in Presence in the News. Bookmark the permalink. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.

One Comment

  1. Sergi
    Posted June 23, 2017 at 9:45 am | Permalink

    The woman that wrote the article at MIC has no knowledge of anything in my opinion. Basically zero knowledge of science and little understdaning of respect. Whoever reads what she wrote about me understands that she is writing about a man with a low IQ and speaking like an idiot… I think it is clear I am not a man with a low IQ. Maybe another man she met? Serioulsy guys, these people should stop writing useless stuff and brainwashing people.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


  • Find Researchers

    Use the links below to find researchers listed alphabetically by the first letter of their last name.

    A | B | C | D | E | F| G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z